data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aaf9/7aaf98ed6a73dc54835003d6ca397a9f2df8cd78" alt="Fallout 4 better than new vegas"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f172/7f17226d88be954af935261e67ae8b091b75437b" alt="fallout 4 better than new vegas fallout 4 better than new vegas"
Most people would probably praise Fallout 3 as the pinnacle of the series, but New Vegas and Fallout 3 are so close in their construction that it’s really a quibble. When the dust settles, though, how does Fallout 4 compare to the previous entries in the series? If you’re literate (and why would you be here if you weren’t), then you already know my thoughts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78679/78679d4c093bdd905c39953eba7189e522e0a4fd" alt="fallout 4 better than new vegas fallout 4 better than new vegas"
Seriously, just check out r/Fallout if you want a healthy dose of critical commentary. However, the game isn’t without it’s flaws, and fans have been quick to point them out extensively and at great length. Certain new additions to the gameplay, like extra layers of weapon customization and the ability to construct a settlement from the ground up, make Fallout 4 a unique (and frickin’ awesome) addition to the canon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aaf9/7aaf98ed6a73dc54835003d6ca397a9f2df8cd78" alt="Fallout 4 better than new vegas"